A DETAILED EXAMINATION OF ALL THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT “UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS” (UFO’S) ARE ACTUALLY “IDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS” (IFO’S).
This article will present and discuss what is suspected to be the USG’s secret view of what UFO’s really are and this will consist of what is a reasonable interpretation of what appears to be true without the high standard of clear and convincing evidence met. Some of the most interesting reports that have been provided are anecdotal first hand witness reports that remain in the “highly possible” category. Despite all the speculation, rumors and hearsay that we have, there are some small but powerful nuggets of truth that have appeared from time to time which help construct a realistic appraisal of what the USG’s actual view of UFO’s really is.
We know that numerous eyewitness reports have come forth from reliable individuals since 1947 up to the present which are not easily discounted. We also know that many have claimed that national security was invoked and they felt threatened to keep quiet about what they saw firsthand and felt compelled to assume the position that they saw and knew nothing other than the official USG position.
STEVEN GREER’S DISCLOSURE PROJECT AND THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB PRESENTATIONS
Within the last 10 years over 50 excellent and credible witnesses with national security credentials have come forth and made public disclosures that normally would involve extreme sanction and yet to date nothing appears to have been done to sanction them, such as was done in the past to such individuals that told what they saw. Several members of Congress had been talked to and expressed an interest in having these witnesses testify in a special Congressional hearing to get the truth about UFO’s out to the public once and for all. Afterwards, for unknown reasons, any such actions have stalled and nothing has been done so far.
Read complete report..
|Comment: Cognitive dissonance is worth the study from some basic facts. When we finally learn something we didn't know, most often our first reaction is to be dumbfounded, as to why one did not already know this. We expect that our human understanding is operating effieciently when it is being manipulated by information handlers and agent provocateurs who interfere with our cognition. In effect, they may be creating a form of redundancy among an array of mental navigation technique. It may be that truth is seen as unnatural and superfluous as a formal maneuver to thwart will.|